OneCoin Mark Scott likely to spend Decades in Prison

OneCoin’s Mark Scott: Denied New Trial Motion and Implications for Investors

In the aftermath of his conviction in November 2019, Mark Scott, who was involved in money laundering for OneCoin, sought an acquittal or a new trial in February 2020.

However, his pursuit of legal relief took an intriguing turn with the emergence of fresh evidence related to Konstantin Ignatov’s perjury, prompting Scott to file a supplemental motion for a new trial in August 2021.

In this supplemental motion, Scott contended that had the jury been aware of Konstantin’s deceitful actions, it would have cast doubt on the credibility of Konstantin’s testimony, which, in turn, might have spared Scott from being found guilty of his charges.

However, the hopes of a new trial were dashed on September 14th, 2023, when Scott’s motion was denied by the court.

Photo showing Mark Scott onecoin Scammer

How the Court said No to Mark Scott unfair requests

The court’s decision was influenced by evidence presented by the Department of Justice (DOJ), which pointed towards Scott’s involvement in bank fraud.

The government specified that the bank fraud allegations included transactions such as the July 2016 Fenero Funds loan to CryptoReal and the June and September 2016 investments into the Fenero Funds by Fates Group LLC, an entity under the control of Gilbert Armenta.

Scott vehemently contested the government’s assertion, arguing that none of these transactions constituted bank fraud.

However, the court ultimately ruled in favor of the government, concluding that all three transactions indeed amounted to bank fraud.

One pivotal aspect of Scott’s defense was the revelation that Konstantin Ignatov had lied about disposing of his laptop.

Scott contended that this newly discovered evidence of perjury should warrant a new trial since Konstantin had been a key government witness.

Scott’s argument rested on the belief that if the jury had known about this perjury, they would not have placed trust in any of Konstantin’s testimony, ultimately leading to a different verdict.

Konstantin made Mark Scott  case complicated

However, the government countered by asserting that Konstantin’s testimony concerning the laptop’s disposition, which occurred after Scott’s crimes, was not a material factor in the jury’s verdict.

They argued that Scott had extensively discredited Konstantin during the trial, making any evidence of perjury related to the laptop merely cumulative.

The court, in line with established legal standards, required Scott to demonstrate a “reasonable likelihood” that Konstantin’s perjury regarding the laptop could have influenced the jury’s verdict.

Scott failed to meet this burden.

This is Ruja Ignatova still in missing

The court pointed out that Konstantin’s testimony regarding the laptop was a minor aspect of his overall testimony, spanning just one or two pages in a trial transcript exceeding three hundred pages.

Furthermore, the laptop’s disposal was a tangential matter and unlikely to have swayed the jury’s determination of Scott’s guilt.

In light of this, and given that Konstantin’s testimony mainly focused on OneCoin’s operations rather than Scott’s involvement, the court concluded that Konstantin’s testimony, even when considered as a whole, did not significantly influence Scott’s guilt.

In a stark reminder, it became evident that lying about discarding a laptop does not absolve one of the grave charges of laundering hundreds of millions of dollars for a criminal enterprise.

Scott’s arguments, primarily of a technical nature, were systematically dismantled by the court.

Consequently, the court refused to entertain the notion that there was a genuine concern that an innocent person might have been convicted or that a manifest injustice had occurred.

How Mark is likely to rot in Jail

Thus, considering all aspects of the case, the court was confident that the jury’s verdict was well-supported by the evidence.

Scott’s sentencing, which has been pending since February 2020 pending the outcome of his acquittal and retrial motions, now looms on the horizon following the denial of these motions.

Given the charges he faces, Scott could potentially be sentenced to up to fifty years in prison.

The scheduling of Scott’s sentencing is expected to take place in the coming weeks.


As of the latest update on September 20th, 2023, Mark Scott’s sentencing has been scheduled for December 12th, 2023, marking a crucial milestone in this high-profile legal saga.

Investors and observers alike should continue to monitor this case closely, as it serves as a stark reminder of the legal consequences that can befall those entangled in financial wrongdoing.

Written and Edited by

Daniel Leinhardt

Editor at FraudWatchAi

Spread the love

One thought on “OneCoin Mark Scott likely to spend Decades in Prison

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. View more
Cookies settings
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookie name Active

Who we are

 Our website address is:


When visitors leave comments on the site we collect the data shown in the comments form, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection.

An anonymized string created from your email address (also called a hash) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you are using it. The Gravatar service privacy policy is available here: After approval of your comment, your profile picture is visible to the public in the context of your comment.


If you upload images to the website, you should avoid uploading images with embedded location data (EXIF GPS) included. Visitors to the website can download and extract any location data from images on the website.


If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year.

If you visit our login page, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser.

When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select "Remember Me", your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed.

If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.

Embedded content from other websites

 Articles on this site may include embedded content (e.g. videos, images, articles, etc.). Embedded content from other websites behaves in the exact same way as if the visitor has visited the other website.

These websites may collect data about you, use cookies, embed additional third-party tracking, and monitor your interaction with that embedded content, including tracking your interaction with the embedded content if you have an account and are logged in to that website.

Our website

FraudwatchAi is powered by WordPress and due to the nature of the platform, collects and retains information about visitors to our website.

Below you’ll find a breakdown of each instance we retain your information when you use our site.

Comments and the Contact Form
When you leave a comment on FraudWatchAi, we record your entered username, email address and website (if optionally provided).

This is information you willingly provide to us when leaving a comment.

In addition to this information we also record your IP address, which is used to monitor for spam.

This information is stored each time a comment is left, so as to maintain functionality of our website.

We also collect and store your entered name and email address when you use our contact form.

Information you provide to us when you leave a comment is retained indefinitely.

Information you provide to us via the contact form is retained until our correspondence via email is complete. At this point the emails we’ve received are deleted.

In certain circumstances, based on the nature of the content, we may indefinitely archive email correspondence for future reference.

Note that we do not sell or share stored information with any third-parties.

By default FraudWatchAi also leaves a temporary cookie on your system when you leave a comment.

This is done so your browser remembers your commenter details and you don’t have to re-enter them each time you leave a comment. The temporary cookie is valid for one year at a time.

You can choose to opt out of this by disabling cookies in your browser settings.

When you opt in to receive notifications of new articles on FraudWatchAi or comments on an article, you provide us with your email address.

This information is kept to enable subscription services to function correctly until you opt out of receiving the service(s) you’ve subscribed for.

Note that we do not automatically add you to any additional mailing lists or newsletters when you subscribe for new articles and/or comments.

FraudwatchAi uses third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website.

These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you.

Privacy Policy -
All trademarks, logos and images are copyright of their respective owners and used under the provision of Fair Use.

Save settings
Cookies settings